There are several software programs (such as Ecofont and Dimples) on the market that claim to reduce the
environmental and economic impact of printing documents and images. These
programs achieve their savings by putting small holes into the characters,
which reduces the ink usage. Some of the programs also come with additional
cost saving features, such as being able to print without images or
in gray scale.
I finally had some time to sit down and test the ink savings of
Ecofont Home Edition. The company’s website claims that the software program
can save up to 50% on ink when printing by converting fonts into Ecofont,
printing images in gray scale or removing images from printed
documents.
The program can convert Times New Roman, Calibri, Arial, Trebuchet
MS, and Verdana. I used these fonts on the same document that I used when testing standard Word fonts.
The results are below.
The ink usages of Ecofonts compared to standard fonts.
Details:
To find the total page coverage, APFill was used with a default paper size of 300dpi.
If you would like to see the standard page that was used, please contact me.
|
The program also comes with other features that
help with ink savings, including the ability to print in gray scale,
to print selected text, and to print documents without images. While these
features are located on one easy to use menu, they are not unique to Ecofont.
These settings can be accessed for free in Microsoft Word by changing Printer
Properties or Word Options.
Overall, I was impressed with the Ecofont program. I really liked
how it converted the fonts during the printing process, which made it easier to
type a document without being distracted by the hazy characters. The program is also great because it puts many ink saving
features into one convenient place. However, I cannot recommend that
individuals purchase the program at its current price. Since many of the ink
saving features are already a part of Microsoft Word or your printer
preferences and there are free fonts that have similar ink savings, it does not
seem like wise $24.95 investment for an individual. I would be interested in seeing what savings could be seen in large organizations, since there are often greater restrictions on what fonts can be used for business communications.